-
June 13, 2022 at 6:42 pm #3185amauryParticipant
As far as I know, it is deemed “not acceptable” to prevent a player’s movement by extending one’s arms laterally. However, after searching the rules, I found no explicit mention of this. The annotation “Player positioning when the disc is in the air (12.6-12.9)” mentions that it’s forbidden for a player that is not making a play for the disc to stick out their arm to impede the movement of another player, but that does not apply if both players are making a play on the disc.
Typical practical example: An attacking player A and defender B are running after a long pass. A is in front of B, but B is faster. To prevent B from reaching the disc, A extends his/her arms in a V or T shape. Since B is behind, this does not cause contact. Is this allowed ? If not, which rules explicitly prevents it ? From my understanding of the rules, if this does not cause contact, I did not find any violation/infraction breached.
Thanks !
June 14, 2022 at 1:38 pm #3188Rueben BergKeymaster12.9 Players may not use their arms or legs to obstruct the movement of opposing players.
July 10, 2022 at 3:21 pm #3217LeonardParticipantHello, I would like to ask for some additional clarification.
12.4. A player in an established position is entitled to remain in that position and must not be contacted by an opposing player.
Does 12.9 take precedence over, or apply to, 12.4? i.e. does it mean, either that I cannot stand in front of a cutter with my arms outstretched (precedence, or not considered part of an established position), or that they are not fouling me if they run through my arms (apply to, arms can’t be used, so not a foul)? Which one? And if the latter, how close to the shoulder are they allowed to go, before it would be considered a foul?
July 10, 2022 at 4:54 pm #3218Rueben BergKeymaster12.9 is a more specific rule that overrides 12.4 (see the introduction text: “Many of these rules are general in nature and cover most situations, however some rules cover specific situations and override the general case.”).
Ideally you should call a violation if someone is using their arms to block you, and not just run through them.
July 10, 2022 at 8:34 pm #3219LeonardParticipantThank you for the clarification.
Ok, so 12.9 prevails and I can’t extend my arms when covering a cutter. What about the case where I am marking the thrower, and a cutter runs through my arm? Does 12.4 prevail, because extending my arms is a legal position, when marking the thrower? Or maybe the case where I see the disk coming, extend my hand to block it, and the cutter runs through my arm to get it? Does the fact that I am trying to block the disk, instead of the cutter work in my favor?
October 20, 2022 at 8:19 pm #3347Carlos Andrés BohmParticipantIf you are marking a thrower and a cutter runs through your arms this is a foul initiated by them (provided you didn’t initiate the contact with your movement).
If you are extending your arm to block or catch a disc and someone runs through it then it’s also a fault, provided you didn’t put your arm there in the last second(s) when they had no chance to avoid contact given their position and speed.
October 20, 2022 at 8:19 pm #3374Carlos Andrés BohmParticipantIf you are marking a thrower and a cutter runs through your arms this is a foul initiated by them (provided you didn’t initiate the contact with your movement).
If you are extending your arm to block or catch a disc and someone runs through it then it’s also a fault, provided you didn’t put your arm there in the last second(s) when they had no chance to avoid contact given their position and speed.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.