Contradiction btwn annotation and diagram for pick

  • June 18, 2017 at 7:40 pm #1463
    Sangho Lee
    Participant

    Hi,

    I found a contradiction between 2017 annotation and 2017 diagram regarding pick.

    In annotiation P16, “If the offensive player had dropped the disc, this would be a turnover (16.2.4.1.) If the pick was called before the throw (or the act of throwing) and neither the pick nor the pick call affected the play – the turnover stands (16.3).” I take the condition can be divided into before/during the throw and after the throw.

    However, if you see the 2017 diagram, the rectangle says “Pick called during/after Throw”. Then, the condition is before the throw or during/after the throw.

    I wonder where “during” belongs. Shouldn’t we clarify this by fixing either annotation or diagram?

    June 22, 2017 at 5:45 am #1465
    Rueben Berg
    Keymaster

    Yes, the annotation should just say this:

    If the offensive player had dropped the disc, this would be a turnover (16.2.4.1.) If the pick was called before the throw (AND the act of throwing) and neither the pick nor the pick call affected the play – the turnover stands (16.3).”

    Thanks

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.