-
May 26, 2017 at 8:12 pm #1448
Marah Neal
ParticipantHi
Can the Continuation rule in 16.3 be applied to injury calls as well? For example if an injury is called but play doesn’t stop and a turn over occurs. Does the turnover still stand if both teams agree that the injury call did not affect the play?
Thanks
May 27, 2017 at 1:55 pm #1451Rueben Berg
Keymaster16.3 does not apply to injury calls as it only applies to a foul or violation call.
However 19.1.7 covers what should happen for an injury call while the disc is in the air:
If the disc was in the air when the injury stoppage was called, play continues until either the pass is caught, or the disc hits the ground. If the injury is not the result of a foul, the completion or turnover stands, and play restarts there after the stoppage.
June 8, 2017 at 3:12 pm #1455Marah Neal
ParticipantThanks for the response!
I’ve also seen situations where an injury will occur in a part of the field away from the disc. As no one hears the call, play doesn’t stop. The thrower then passes the disc several seconds after the call was made and the (unmarked) receiver drops it.
I can’t find any rules that speak to this instance so it would seem that 8.1.3 “The disc is dead, and no turnover is possible after a call which stops the play or any other stoppage, until the disc is checked in” would apply but that doesn’t feel right to me since a pass was made to an open player and the player dropped it.
Is there another rule that overrides 8.1? Do the players on the field have the discretion to play continuation anyway?
June 8, 2017 at 4:25 pm #1456Rueben Berg
KeymasterDo the players on the field have the discretion to play continuation anyway?
Not according to the rules. The disc would have to come back.
September 13, 2017 at 2:41 pm #1491Michael Remy
Participant[quote=”rueben” post=1287]
Do the players on the field have the discretion to play continuation anyway?
Not according to the rules. The disc would have to come back.[/quote]
So you would advice that the disc goes back and the turnover doesn’t stand. For me this seems counterintuitive. Could you explain why the rules were designed that way? Perhaps that would help explaining the situation on the field as well.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
