January 8, 2013 at 10:18 am
#233
Ravi Vasudevan
Participant
Okay thanks for the help. I still think the wording is going to cause a lot of confusion since 16.1 directly states “no turn over is possible”. Perhaps in the next revision change this to “no turn over is possible with the exception of rule 16.2 and 16.3”. Tanks again.