Thanks for the above discussion. A couple of points from me:
– if there are particular questions that people have issues with, please email me the concern and if you have a suggested amendment, that would also be great: rules@wfdf.sport
– if anyone has some suggested new questions, or new question formats, please email some examples and I would be happy to consider them: rules@wfdf.sport
– regarding Australian nationals, I have repeatedly advised AFDA that WFDF does not require 100% of players to pass the Advanced accreditation and that I don’t think AFDA should either
– one matter raised above that I always struggle with is that the test “shouldn’t rely on highly specific wording” or concerns to that effect. It is a test of peoples understanding of the Rules of Ultimate. I believe that the rules use very specific wording to convey very specific meaning. So it confuses me to understand how a test about peoples understanding of a carefully and precisely worded set of rules could avoid testing peoples ability to understand a careful and precise set of words. But as above, if people have specific suggestions, please email me: rules@wfdf.sport